Re: php4/pear proposal, core stuff
| From: | Pierre-Alain Joye | Date: | Tue, 08 Jan 2002 00:54:44 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: php4/pear proposal, core stuff | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-3819@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Tue, 8 Jan 2002 01:42:46 +0100
"Edin Kadribasic" <edink@proventum.net> wrote:
> I know many people consider perl's cpan to be a good example. I don't. Last
> time I needed was for Report Magic for Analog which needed about 10 other
> packages to work. When I finally gave up on trying to install packages
> manually (the dependencies got to difficult to handle), and opted for
> automatic update, it updated nearly everyting including perl itself. Now, I
> wasn't very happy about it because it broke a lot of things on my system.
Exactly what I said end of last year, and I remember the discussion, nothing was decided on which
modules can be considered as core modules (standard class library).
> It is therefore I think that having a standard class library, as known from
> most other languages, is a God Thing.
+10^32 :)
pa