Re: cvs: pear
/HTML_Progress/examples/monitordefault1.htmldefault1.phpdefault2.htmlfunction_callback.htmlfunction_callback.phphtmlpage.htmlhtmlpage.phpitdynamic.htmlitdynamic.phpmethod_callback.htmlmethod_callback.php

From: Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 14:00:17 +0000
Subject: Re: cvs: pear
/HTML_Progress/examples/monitordefault1.htmldefault1.phpdefault2.htmlfunction_callback.htmlfunction_callback.phphtmlpage.htmlhtmlpage.phpitdynamic.htmlitdynamic.phpmethod_callback.htmlmethod_callback.php
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-38872@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Pierre-Alain Joye wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 15:24:04 +0200 pear@laurent-laville.org (Laurent Laville) wrote:
What does this means ? i'm on wrong way since HTML_Progress2 2.0.0RC1 with the examples removes from main package
I think so. Examples are part of the documentation, documentation is required. The package size argument does not make sense at all. --Pierre
So what do you think about the tutorial (called the "HTML_Progress 1.x - The Definitive Guide") inside the package. It's part of documentation too, but unworkable on PEAR website related to my post on june 15 http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=pear-dev&m=111884484615894&w=2 where i explained my problems " ... I got (again today) 404 error with versions 1.2.0 and 1.2.1 docs ..." The only way to see it, again today, is to visit my site What is your opinion ? Should we keep it, removes, or anything else ? On other way, i don't really think that they are so many pear packages with as much doc parts: tuto, examples ... And finally, i've worst problem, higher than maintainer who don't publish docs and examples . It let me think that to be lazy would be better ! regards Laurent

« previous php.pear.dev (#38872) next »