Re: DB_Binary Draft
| From: | yavo | Date: | Sat, 17 Mar 2001 10:50:17 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: DB_Binary Draft | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-39@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
"Jon Parise" <jon@csh.rit.edu> wrote in message
news:20010316195449.A384@csh.rit.edu...
> I haven't had a really good look at your classes, but I wonder why you
> don't merge this new functionality with the existing DB class
> hierarchy. Is there a reason why you're defining a new set of classes
> for storing binary files?
No no reason it just seemed to make sence at the time. I agree with you but
wouldn't PEAR::DB beacome too overbloated it we started adding all types of
new functionality to it. I've already seen people complaining that it's too
big.