Re: DB_Binary Draft
| From: | Jon Parise | Date: | Sat, 17 Mar 2001 15:54:21 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: DB_Binary Draft | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-40@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Sat, Mar 17, 2001 at 12:50:17PM +0200, yavo wrote:
> > I haven't had a really good look at your classes, but I wonder why you
> > don't merge this new functionality with the existing DB class
> > hierarchy. Is there a reason why you're defining a new set of classes
> > for storing binary files?
>
> No no reason it just seemed to make sence at the time. I agree with you but
> wouldn't PEAR::DB beacome too overbloated it we started adding all types of
> new functionality to it. I've already seen people complaining that it's too
> big.
I suppose that's debatable. I guess it would depend on how much code
is common between your DB_Binary implementation and the existing DB
implementation.
--
Jon Parise (jon@csh.rit.edu) . Rochester Inst. of Technology
http://www.csh.rit.edu/~jon/ : Computer Science House
Member