Re: Re: PHP License

From: Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 05:04:01 +0000
Subject: Re: Re: PHP License
References: 1 2 3 4  Groups: php.pear.dev php.pear.qa 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-39531@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Can you please make this another thread, this is outside the scope of the original message :) Arnaud. Ian Eure wrote:
On Tuesday 23 August 2005 09:34 pm, Justin Patrin wrote:
On 8/23/05, Ian Eure <ieure@php.net> wrote:
On Tuesday 23 August 2005 05:46 pm, Joe Stump wrote:
I agree. I never understood why we used the PHP license over, say, the BSD or LGPL (which both fit library level type code a lot better IMO). To have the license require distribution of PHP is a little odd. What I'm a tad more confused about is why anyone would maintain their packages through apt instead of pear. pear upgrade Package_Name - or - pear upgrade-all Translates about as well as "apt-get install php4-pear-package-name" I would think.


« previous php.pear.dev (#39531) next »