Re: Adding Includesupport to IntegratedTemplates

From: Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 09:36:45 +0000
Subject: Re: Adding Includesupport to IntegratedTemplates
References: 1  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-4036@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
le 21/01/02 23:46, Alexander Merz à alexander.merz@s1999.tu-chemnitz.de a écrit : >> Isn't it why ITX (not IT) was made for ? > ITX is a rewrite of the phplib templates based on IT. There is no reason why > should IT could do the same. If both IT and ITX can do the same thing, then is there a reason why you would use ITX as IT is (was) much lighter ? The purpose of IT as mentioned in the doc is : "I needed a template class that supports a SINGLE template file with multiple (nested) blocks inside and a simple block API." You can refer to the in-class doc for more info. Note that I am not against the change but I would like to know if these changes were agreed by Ulf, as it looks that it was not the purpose of the class from the beginning. BTW, it is the first time I hear ITX is a rewrite of PHPlib template. Are you sure ? They don't work the same at all. Bertrand Mansion Mamasam

« previous php.pear.dev (#4036) next »