Re: Adding Includesupport to IntegratedTemplates

Bertrand Mansion wrote:

Note that I am not against the change but I would like to know if these changes were agreed by Ulf, as it looks that it was not the purpose of the class from the beginning.

I do agree with that changes - almost of course I do agree. I'm not sure where one should place the patch. If most of you tend to say that include is a core feature, put it into IT. If notm ITX is a more appropriate place becase addBlock*() lives there and include is somewhat similar to that. I doubt that it will make much of a difference where you put it concerning speed or ease of use.

BTW, it is the first time I hear ITX is a rewrite of PHPlib template. Are you sure ? They don't work the same at all.

True, it's features are roughly comparable as they belong to the same class of template engines, but they are definetly different. Ulf