Re: Why does package 1.0 DTD keep changing?

Alexey Borzov wrote: > I've read up a bit on DTDs and what 'determinist' is and seems like it > was right thing to do after all, since moving from broken DTD to a > non-broken one cannot be considered a BC break. Making <filelist> > mandatory is another thing and I've opened a bug for this: > http://pear.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=5866 Thank you > Greg, I also have a question: looks like you use XML Schema yourself, > but PEAR documentation only describes validating package.xml against > DTD. Shouldn't it point out that there also exists a Schema which is a > better thing to validate against? yes, if you can open a bug for the documentation page that doesn't say this, that would be great (I was not aware of such a page, to be honest). It should be noted that the DTD for package.xml 1.0 is probably more accurate, but that there is no dtd for package.xml 2.0, the schema is the only valid source. Thanks, Greg