Re: [PEPr] Comment on HTML::HTML_SimpleCalendar

I was not insulting at all, if it transpired that was certainly not my intent. I had in mind what others have suggested about separating the html/js. The mixing makes the code looks busy/dense. As to using calendar it was just a question, in no way am I asking you to use it ;) Hope that clarifies :) Arnaud. Quoting Josh Peters <jcpeters@gmail.com>:

Josh Peters (http://pear.php.net/user/enricopulatzo) has commented on the proposal for HTML::HTML_SimpleCalendar. Comment: Arnaud, I've gone ahead and changed the name. I was a little confused, as I figured vainly that the category name would automatically be prepended to it with an underscore. Can you explain your usage of the word "dense"? I hope you are not being insulting. (if so, I can deal with it, but I just want to know what you're talking about) The reason for not using the Calendar package was that it was still "beta" (and not "stable") so I didn't want to be working on top of a package that was still very much subject to change (this may have been a poor assumption on my part). Proposal information: http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-proposal-show.php?id=322 -- Sent by PEPr, the automatic proposal system at http://pear.php.net -- PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php