Re: Re: [PEPr] Proposal for PEAR::PEAR_Frontend_Gtk2
| From: | Christian Weiske | Date: | Tue, 29 Nov 2005 16:48:47 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [PEPr] Proposal for PEAR::PEAR_Frontend_Gtk2 | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-40554@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Pierre,
> However the main reason of my mail remains, this is a major version of
> an existing package, no need of a proposal but an agreement of the
> current maintainers, I doubt there will be any objection but a matter
> of principles :)
How can I express that it's a completely different package? I chose
_Gtk2 because it's Gtk2 based, not because it's version 2 of the
package. What name should I use?
--
Regards/MfG,
Christian Weiske
Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] OpenPGP digital signature signature.asc
Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] OpenPGP digital signature signature.asc