Re: DBDOFB: Proposal for new configuration option

From: Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 20:23:47 +0000
Subject: Re: DBDOFB: Proposal for new configuration option
References: 1 2 3 4  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-41155@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
I see. I don't see that as being particularly useful for most use-cases. In fact, I can think of no real reason to have such a thing. If the connections must exist it doesn't make too much sense to use crossLinks in the first place... Then again, do understand your specific case, it just doesn't seem all that generally useful. I'd raher not include it for now as FB is too monolithic already. The next version (if it ever happens) will be much more modular and allow for new classes for different type of elements. I haven't had the time yet to finalize the API (I've barely started). If you're interested, I can show y ou the code so far. -- Justin Patrin -- PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Ok I understand, for sure if the next version will more flexible and expandable there's no reason to make the current version more and more heavycode... Anyway I'll try to implement this option to my dataObject sub-class instead of hacking FB, to avoid bad surprises upgrading to the next release of FormBuilder. Will it use the same API or will it be another package ? (formBuilder2 ?) I'd be really interested indeed to know more about the next version, hopefully I could help although I don't consider myself skilled enough yet to get involved in the base structure of such a package (sorry if my English is not clear).
\ | /
Arnaud Sellenet-Bodin Dév et dés http://demental.info Tel : 05 63 55 24 46 / | \

« previous php.pear.dev (#41155) next »