Re: Re: cvs: pear /PEAR_Command_Packaging/tests/make-rpm-spec test1.outtest1.phpttest_option_rpm-depname.out
test_option_rpm-depname.phpt test_option_rpm-pkgname.outtest_option_rpm-pkgname.phpttest_option_rpm-release.out test_option_rpm-re
| From: | bertrand Gugger | Date: | Fri, 17 Feb 2006 22:30:52 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: cvs: pear /PEAR_Command_Packaging/tests/make-rpm-spec test1.outtest1.phpttest_option_rpm-depname.out test_option_rpm-depname.phpt test_option_rpm-pkgname.outtest_option_rpm-pkgname.phpttest_option_rpm-release.out test_option_rpm-re |
||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-41391@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Bonsoir, Stefano,
Stefano F. Rausch wrote:
Bertrand, IIRC some months ago there was a discussion about running tests with PEAR. Not only phpt ones, but PHPUnit(2) ones too. Didn't Greg suggest to put the tests into the Tests folder after Sebastian confirmed how PHPUnit(2) do test themselves? Please correct me, if I'm wrong. Furthermore, I did not suggest that PHPUnit2 should be the standard testing framework for PHP 5 packages. Just that the tests should be located in the Tests sub package. Nothing more.OK, sorry for the misunderstanding. No, for myself, I don't like the idea to practically double packages. Only in some huge cases, as was said in this thread. It gave, and still give some talks by QA about officialy reckognized test means too, I mixed... -- toggg