Re: Re: cvs: pear /PEAR_Command_Packaging/tests/make-rpm-spec test1.outtest1.phpttest_option_rpm-depname.out
test_option_rpm-depname.phpt test_option_rpm-pkgname.outtest_option_rpm-pkgname.phpttest_option_rpm-release.out test_option_rpm-re

From: Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 21:00:19 +0000
Subject: Re: Re: cvs: pear /PEAR_Command_Packaging/tests/make-rpm-spec test1.outtest1.phpttest_option_rpm-depname.out
test_option_rpm-depname.phpt test_option_rpm-pkgname.outtest_option_rpm-pkgname.phpttest_option_rpm-release.out test_option_rpm-re
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-41381@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Bertrand, IIRC some months ago there was a discussion about running tests with PEAR. Not only phpt ones, but PHPUnit(2) ones too. Didn't Greg suggest to put the tests into the Tests folder after Sebastian confirmed how PHPUnit(2) do test themselves? Please correct me, if I'm wrong. Furthermore, I did not suggest that PHPUnit2 should be the standard testing framework for PHP 5 packages. Just that the tests should be located in the Tests sub package. Nothing more. -- Stefano bertrand Gugger wrote:
Stefano F. Rausch wrote:
Isn't this the way PHPUnit2 structures the tests Greg? IMHO this should be the standard for PHP5 packages.
No ways, I rely on basic things. Anyway, the guidelines say pear's phpt or PHPUnit. http://pear.php.net/manual/en/developers.contributing.php division 4. Actual is you find both .phpt (php or pear), both PHPUnit ("" or "2"), phpsimple (? not sure about this one)


« previous php.pear.dev (#41381) next »