Re: [PEPr] Comment on XML::XML_BOINC
| From: | bertrand Gugger | Date: | Mon, 27 Feb 2006 13:15:14 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [PEPr] Comment on XML::XML_BOINC | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-41510@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Dan Rossi wrote:
I know, i think the requirements also requires background documentation anyway ?Some packages are quite specialized, refering to some "in the world" notions, what people not necessarly know. A proposer knows exactly what s?he refers. Google also, but not sure it's always the same. Anyway, revising a proposal, if done honestly, requires lot of personal investment, so better give some accurate reference. Even if it looks obvious by "introduced" people. So, not only the time for it, as said Arnaud, but also the accuracy. -- toggg
On 27/02/2006, at 10:07 PM, Arnaud Limbourg wrote:Dan Rossi wrote:Little bit of googlingIndeed, but imagine the time needed if you had to google for every proposal :) Arnaud. -- PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php