Re: Re: Next version of QuickForm should be?..

From: Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2006 15:15:36 +0000
Subject: Re: Re: Next version of QuickForm should be?..
References: 1 2 3 4  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-42790@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On 6/6/06, Lukas Smith <lsmith@php.net> wrote:
Greg Beaver wrote: Oh God no, just register the package and start up, no need for proposals. If you would like input that's a different story, but I I propose the first one to commit a half way sane version naming standard to peardoc gets to decide. But it seems like everybody has agreed to version 2 1.0 so far.
It seems very strange to me that everyone seems to agree on HTML_QuickForm2 1.x when this isn't allowed by the said naminf RFC. I agree that it makes more sense than HTML_QuickForm2 4.x, but the RFC/docs really should be updated in this case since the proposed scheme doesn't fit within the RFC. -- Justin Patrin

« previous php.pear.dev (#42790) next »