Re: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Image_Tools-0.4.0 (beta) Released.

Hi Greg, On 10/13/06, Gregory Beaver <greg@chiaraquartet.net> wrote:

Firman Wandayandi wrote: On 10/13/06, Ian Warner <iwarner@triangle-solutions.com> wrote:

Just tried to download this to test out: 1. downloading Image_Tools-0.4.0.tgz ... Starting to download Image_Tools-0.4.0.tgz (18,003 bytes) ......done: 18,003 bytes ERROR: bad md5sum for file C:\PHP5.1.6\pear\data\Image_Tools\package2.xml I did an upgrade and tried again same thing.

I got the same message even I tried on a local tarball, I don't know what is meant. I tried to package it over and over, but still got the same message. Anyone have a clue for this?

2. Homesite is giving a 404 http://schlitt.info/index.php/content.projects_image_tools

Yes, I just removed it. It doesn't valid anymore.

3. No end-user docs in this package. and no http://pear.php.net/package/Image_Tools/docs/0.4.0/ API docs?

I guess the API docs it doesn't generated yet or because checksum error.

Did something happen with the upgrade you just submitted?

Not sure, nothing wrong I did. Hi Firman, Actually, the problem is that the script you use to generate package.xml does not ignore package2.xml. Please pull the 0.4.0 release and re-package with 'package2.xml' added to the list of ignored files. You can see the mistake at http://pear.php.net/rest/r/image_tools/package.0.4.0.xml: Here is the offending line: <file role="data" baseinstalldir="" name="package2.xml"> <replace type="package-info" from="@package_version@" to="version"/> </file> What this is doing is packing up package2.xml, but then all of those @package_version@ tags are replaced with 0.4.0, causing calculation of md5sum to fail because the contents of package2.xml are different from what was on disk.

Oh, yes I did it. Thanks for the clue. I will re-package it.

Could you please open a bug for the pear website that states "release upload validation should check for presence of package.xml inside package.xml"

Should be package2.xml inside package.xml right? Regards, -- Firman Wandayandi <http://firmanw.org/>