Re: build package xml 1.0, why not package xml 2.0
| From: | Joshua Eichorn | Date: | Fri, 13 Oct 2006 17:16:43 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: build package xml 1.0, why not package xml 2.0 | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-44499@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Laurent Laville wrote:
Joshua Eichorn a écrit :-joshWell if you anything like me you grabbed an example file months ago and just edit it now. Since its working i haven't bothered to upgrade any of my packaging scripts. -joshFirst i would thanks you Josh for your feedback ! Second, i don't know when package xml 1.0 support will be definitively drop, but i'm sure it will be one day. Third, i've already decided to drop support of package xml 1.0 generation in PEAR_PackageFileManager2 in next version (1.6.0RC1). And without answer, i think Greg Beaver is agree with me . In very soon beta 5 (last beta) i've already marked this exportCompatiblePackageFile1() method. as deprecated. Major reason is difficulty to import (all taks files options) of previous existing package as i've already did with beta 5 (into PEAR CVS). Laurent Whats the URL for a package.php type script for packagefilemanager2?