Re: build package xml 1.0, why not package xml 2.0

From: Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 17:28:14 +0000
Subject: Re: build package xml 1.0, why not package xml 2.0
References: 1  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-44502@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Hi Laurent, On 10/13/06, Laurent Laville <pear@laurent-laville.org> wrote:
Hi all, I've noticed that lot of maintainers still use PEAR_PackageFileManager to build their packages, and the package xml version 1.0 Why not use PEAR_PackageFileManager2 (1.6.0) to begin to build the package xml version 2.0 ?
I just need a compatible package for older version of PEAR Installer. But I already packaged my own pear-like packages with PEAR_PackageFileManager2 just because I'm sure my PEAR Installer is support the package xml v2.0. Well, I love PEAR_PackageFileManager2 is more smarter and advanced for sure. Regards, -- Firman Wandayandi <http://firmanw.org/>

« previous php.pear.dev (#44502) next »