Re: PEAR Documentation coverage analysis
| From: | Gregory Beaver | Date: | Sat, 21 Oct 2006 14:56:17 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: PEAR Documentation coverage analysis | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-44700@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Martin Jansen wrote:
> On Fri Oct 20, 2006 at 07:0057PM +0200, Mark Wiesemann wrote:
>> Martin Jansen wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu Oct 19, 2006 at 02:2653PM +0200, Christian Weiske wrote:
>>>> Should I put the package into CVS somewhere?
>>> Certainly, but I'm not sure where "somewhere" should be. Suggestions
>>> anyone?
>> Maybe pearweb/tools/? (not existing yet). Would be a good starting point
>> to include such tools later directly into the website.
>
> Or Christian could just upload the code as an ordinary package in the
> "Tools and Utilities" category. Or we make a new category "QA tools"
> for such code.
It may be good to make a category "PEAR Website" and a subcategory "QA
Tools" so that we can release pearweb as a package through pear.php.net.
This would make syncing quite a bit easier
Greg