Re: PEAR Documentation coverage analysis

On Sun Oct 22, 2006 at 09:3723PM +0200, Arnaud Limbourg wrote: > Gregory Beaver wrote: > > Martin Jansen wrote: > >> On Fri Oct 20, 2006 at 07:0057PM +0200, Mark Wiesemann wrote: > >>> Martin Jansen wrote: > >>> > >>>> On Thu Oct 19, 2006 at 02:2653PM +0200, Christian Weiske wrote: > >>>>> Should I put the package into CVS somewhere? > >>>> Certainly, but I'm not sure where "somewhere" should be. > >>>> Suggestions > >>>> anyone? > >>> Maybe pearweb/tools/? (not existing yet). Would be a good starting point > >>> to include such tools later directly into the website. > >> Or Christian could just upload the code as an ordinary package in the > >> "Tools and Utilities" category. Or we make a new category "QA > >> tools" > >> for such code. > > > > It may be good to make a category "PEAR Website" and a subcategory "QA > > Tools" so that we can release pearweb as a package through pear.php.net. > > This would make syncing quite a bit easier > > +1 I like that, too. Christian, are you willing to release your code in such a category? - Martin