Re: PEAR Documentation coverage analysis
| From: | Arnaud Limbourg | Date: | Sun, 22 Oct 2006 19:37:23 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: PEAR Documentation coverage analysis | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-44712@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Gregory Beaver wrote:
> Martin Jansen wrote:
>> On Fri Oct 20, 2006 at 07:0057PM +0200, Mark Wiesemann wrote:
>>> Martin Jansen wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thu Oct 19, 2006 at 02:2653PM +0200, Christian Weiske wrote:
>>>>> Should I put the package into CVS somewhere?
>>>> Certainly, but I'm not sure where "somewhere" should be.
>>>> Suggestions
>>>> anyone?
>>> Maybe pearweb/tools/? (not existing yet). Would be a good starting point
>>> to include such tools later directly into the website.
>> Or Christian could just upload the code as an ordinary package in the
>> "Tools and Utilities" category. Or we make a new category "QA tools"
>> for such code.
>
> It may be good to make a category "PEAR Website" and a subcategory "QA
> Tools" so that we can release pearweb as a package through pear.php.net.
> This would make syncing quite a bit easier
+1
Arnaud.