Re: Doctrine base class
| From: | Stephan Schmidt | Date: | Fri, 29 Dec 2006 13:48:14 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Doctrine base class | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-45365@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi,
Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
As such I would personally prefer if we stick with Doctrine. For one thats what its known for outside already. While the name itself is not selfdescriptory I think it will still be clearer for users what it is and how it relates (or rather that it does not relate to them) to DB/MDB2. With LiveUser we have another precedent where for one we wanted to clearly separate the name from Auth, so we ended up with an "invented" name. -1 on Doctrine. If I use any library, that uses the non-PEAR version of Doctrine, two classes with the same name will be included which results in an error.I find it strange, that one day, we discuss prefixing all new classes with PEAR_ and you vote +1 and now you want to name a class just Doctrine... Best regards, Stephan