Re: Doctrine base class
| From: | Bertrand Mansion | Date: | Sat, 30 Dec 2006 10:38:30 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Doctrine base class | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-45384@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Le 29 déc. 06 à 14:36, Lukas Kahwe Smith a écrit :
Bertrand Mansion wrote:HTML_Table and everything else with the HTML prefix is neither a new major version of an HTML package (which doesn't exist anyway) nor an extension of it. Packages like DB_NestedSet or DB_Query etc. are in DB because it's logical.I am -1 on Doctrine. The name should be DB_Doctrine since it is related to databases. The fact it replaces DB/MDB2/DBDO, or not, doesn't matter. There are some standards, we must respect them and make no exceptions otherwise we will endup with clashes and misunderstandings (what is this Doctrine thing that lives in my pear dir???).DB_Doctrine is not mandated by any standard. If at all it would be a new major version of DB itself.