Re: hosting packages on external VCS sites
| From: | Helgi Þormar Þorbjörnsson | Date: | Sat, 24 Mar 2007 01:21:25 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: hosting packages on external VCS sites | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-45997@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 15:09:58 -0500, Gregory Beaver wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am dismayed to see that a few of our packages that have external
> hosting of revision control now come up as 404, and some with external
> documentation come up as 404.
>
> What do you think?
>
> Greg
Well I totally agree, maybe not the domain name because as someone
pointed out, they can lapse.
Actually this issue has been discussed before, the RCS issue that is,
both here on the list (~ 1 year ago) and I posted some thoughts of my own
about this on my blog but it's currently down, I'm waiting for Pierre to
come back to live so he can install the system I sent him then I'll post
the link to the blog post, it's a somewhat excerpt of the discussion that
we had here.
The bottom line is, either use cvs.php.net or a public service or be an
established project like Horde, pat, etc that actually could pull off
hosting their code them self.
About the doc issue, I'm all about keeping it all on pearweb, docbook
would be best but then someone would have to step up and make peardoc not
use some utterly odd format of docbook and be more in pair with the php
manual, the most important reason for this is to being able to use the
nifty revision tool they have over at the phpdoc team, something you
can't really get on wikis when we are dealing with multi language docs
unless we maintain revision numbers by hand and make our own little
scripts to travers the db to show who is out of date with the English
version, how far behind, what's missing and such.
Regards
Helgi