Re: PEAR2 standards: anything good at all?

From: Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 00:50:40 +0000
Subject: Re: PEAR2 standards: anything good at all?
References: 1  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-47532@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 09:18:44 -0700 (PDT), Pádraic Brady <padraic.brady@yahoo.com> wrote:
Its seems APC + require_once + __autoload() keeps getting changed between performing well and performing badly every few days. It's been months since PHP 5.2 was released - it can't be that hard to figure out which one is right at this point in time. Did either of the two benchmarks which seem to disagree on results test this?
Yes I did include this in my tests. Under APC from slowest to fastest it was require_once -> __autoload -> allfiles. Without APC require_once was still the slowest while __autoload and allfiles where neck and neck (within 1%). Without APC I suspect __autoload would be the fastest if you where using less than the entire package. Adam Ashley

« previous php.pear.dev (#47532) next »