Re: Bugs mailing list

On 11/1/07, Joshua Eichorn <josh@bluga.net> wrote: > Joe Stump wrote: > >> Didn't mean to start a holy war here guys :-) > > > > Not a holy war. I'm just forgetting that Open Source is a bureaucracy > > as opposed to a business. This is so far outside of the scope of what > > PEAR's *core competency* is it's amazing it's even being discussed to > > me. In fact, it's been disallowed that *applications* be created, > > submitted and distributed via PEAR for some time now (the exception > > being pearweb; even the PEAR channel code is on a separate channel). > > > > What I'm saying is, as a consumer of PEAR, I find it sad that > > brilliant, core PHP developers are proposing chasing the bug tracker > > holy grail rather than making me cool ass PHP libraries. As a lazy > > PEAR developer I'm saying have fun; I'll be sticking to creating more > > PEAR code for now. > > > > With that I'm out. > > > > --Joe > > > I'll agree with not spending time on a bug tracker, but we already have > one. And any change is going to be a lot of work, so lets just stick > with the current one. Anything else we pick will be just as bad (you > only like tools until you use them). Rumour has it that the current one will be replaced anyway? Someone said Jani and Greg are working on a new one. It could be as simple as a vote if people want trac. My last 2 cents. Till