Re: Re: question about package(2).xml from CVS

Carsten Wiedmann wrote: > Gregory Beaver schrieb: > >>> But it's not possible to install the package with: >>> > cd pear\Foo_Bar >>> > pear install package.xml >>> >>> So I want ask, what are the rules for package(2).xml files in CVS? >> >> If it is not possible, the package is broken. > > Thus, in accordance with my answer for Chuck [1] the package DB_Table is > brocken and I have to report a bug. No, the package is working fine. It just doesn't make sense to have (unreleased) changelog items in the package(2).xml file that refer to the wrong (= old) date and/or version number. That's why date, time, and version are set to "?" currently. There are several packages in PEAR that handle the package.xml this way. Regards, Mark -- http://www.markwiesemann.eu