Re: [PEPr] Comment on File System::S3

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Gregory Beaver wrote: > There are too many similarities. Let me excerpt a few examples. So what apparently happened? 1. Some intern at Till's company copied Cesar's code, removed all copyright clauses, maybe changed some stuff and claimed the code his [why didn't people ask back then, who is "Jeff Arthur" when reviewing the code?] 2. Till copied his companies code [with permission], added copyright clauses, changed some stuff, still didn't ask who is "Jeff Arthur" and submitted the code to PEPR. 3. Cesar luckily found this proposal which strongly proves that PEPR is the way to go. That Jeff Arthur thing gets me sick for several reasons: First, as you wrote, it strongly indicates, that this code is Cesar's code. Second, I can't understand, why nobody at Till's company (including himself) asked your question "who is Jeff Arthur"? It is so unlikely to have anyone living in Germany having that name, that this question HAS TO BE asked if some intern comes up with some code he's claiming his, having a reference to that name in it. So what's next? That package definitely makes sense, so I'd love to see it in PEAR, either with the right license and credits or as a complete rewrite. - - Sebastian -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32) iD8DBQFHV6XusvwfldR9VeARAsreAJ9M22t0aMgOTXpIu/dZpb46pgXq2ACg1fpc OPNIhQhtdodB7CN/z77lwZk= =I2mr -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----