Re: Re: Proposal for new package

From: Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 16:55:47 +0000
Subject: Re: Re: Proposal for new package
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-49155@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Jeff Trudeau wrote: > If this was ported to C and made an extension itself, that would certainly > work (I had thought of doing this at some point, but not now). Keep in mind > this library was conceived about 2 weeks ago, so is still quite in its > infancy ;) What I think Till meant, is an implementation of the memcache client written in PHP, not a porting to C of your package. -Philippe > On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 11:44 AM, till <klimpong@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 4:15 PM, Jeff Trudeau <jeff.trudeau@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> To clarify, this library requires pecl_memcache in order to interface >> with >>> memcached. It is written in PHP (not C), and thus can't communicate >>> natively with memcached. >> excuse me asking (since I have little experience with memcache) - but >> would it be possible to have a PHP implementation without the pecl >> extension? >> >> This is already what Arnaud said, and that's where I would see a real >> benefit too. >> >> Cheers, >> Till

« previous php.pear.dev (#49155) next »