Re: Re: Proposal for new package

There was a fairly recent submission to phpclasses which claimed to do this. http://www.phpclasses.org/browse/package/4094.html I haven't looked at the code but I'm assuming from this that it is possible. Having said this I'm not convinced of the value. I can't think up a situation where you would have memcache on a server and be unable to get the extension installed. Cheers, Jonathan On 14/02/2008, till <klimpong@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 4:15 PM, Jeff Trudeau <jeff.trudeau@gmail.com> wrote: > > To clarify, this library requires pecl_memcache in order to interface with > > memcached. It is written in PHP (not C), and thus can't communicate > > natively with memcached. > > > excuse me asking (since I have little experience with memcache) - but > would it be possible to have a PHP implementation without the pecl > extension? > > This is already what Arnaud said, and that's where I would see a real > benefit too. > > Cheers, > Till > > > -- > > PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > >