Re: Bug Triage

From: Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 14:29:10 +0000
Subject: Re: Bug Triage
References: 1 2  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-50329@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Hi, Well even if Daniel is willing to step up and help me I think you should too if you are interested, having couple of people willing to drive it on is important - so if one falls out due to family problems, vacation, work etc etc then the others can pick up the slack, 2 guys might be not enough for that :-P I like daniels idea of focusing on X and Y package, up till now it's mostly been about allowing people to pick the package they want to work on and assist with that so we've usually ended up with 1 package per person and nobody working on the same thing, that seemed to work fine when we are dealing with the small packages. So if we try to focus on a single package or a task (for example documentation writing) it would be good. One extremely important thing we could do is pick a really popular package with low test count and go nuts - I think we should be able to setup some kind of a mashup with a smallish algo that tells us packages that are popular + test count + total bugs + current open ones ... Obviously something more clever than that tho ;-) Anyway brainstorm away boys - I'm hoping I found a power outlet soon at the airport or I won't be able to join in the discussion until tomorrow. Regards Helgi On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 4:00 PM, Chuck Burgess <demon.gene@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > After my first PEAR Group meeting last weekend, I had grand plans about > putting some organization around the faltering triages. I had expected a > relatively free day at the office on Friday, which I'd set aside for review > of the existing wiki pages on past triages, and use those as a guide to > build a plan for this weekend's triage. > > I had a family medical issue come up Thursday evening, which had me driving > up to Tennessee for a long weekend of drama... so much for grand plans. > > After getting through this weekend's triage, I had planned (there's that > fatal word again, "plan") to suggest moving the triage duration out a good > bit -- fewer triage opportunities might make for stronger intentions for > attendance by those who are interested but that felt lots of opportunities > meant it's easy to decide at the last minute "eh, I need to do *foo* so I'll > skip today's, and just go to the next one in two weeks". So, Helgi's > increase is a welcome one in my mind. > > I'm happy to defer to Daniel on the organizing and analysis tasks... I had > decided to take these on because I didn't see them continuing past May. And > I *pledge* to improve my attendance at the triages, not to mention the fact > that I've allowed phpDocumentor to become one of the worst bug offenders ;) > > Today I'm still in the process of making up my missed work time from Friday > and Saturday, so I can't make it to today's triage. I will however be > confirming my attendance for the next one just as soon as I see the Calendar > event dates are updated. I'll be online working all day today, so any > questions about phpDocumentor that I can help with, shoot them my way... I'm > afraid IRC will distract me too much today.

« previous php.pear.dev (#50329) next »