Re: Re: PEAR CS Documentation Incorrect?

Chuck you're proposed solution makes sense - it is an example after-all... k. On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 12:24 PM, Chuck Burgess <demon.gene@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Mark Wiesemann <wiesemann@php.net> wrote: > > > Hannes Magnusson wrote: > > > >> As you can see by the highlighting, that example is b0rked. > >> I assume the documentor was trying to prevent the $Id$ keyword being > >> expanded by SVN. > >> This _could_ also be a bug in the application rendering the markup > >> (PhD)... > >> > >> Please file this as a documentation bug report :] > >> > > > > The bug report already exists since March: > > http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=47679 > > > > Regards, > > Mark > > > > I took a look at that PHP bug, as well as looking at both the example in > the > docs and its source in standards.xml. Since both occurrences are examples > of usage, should it matter if CVS/SVN expands the $Id$ keyword? If it > doesn't, then the example shows you what you should write in your @version > tag... if it does, the example shows what a fully expanded @version tag > looks like. Either/both are reasonable example content, IMO. If there are > no objections to this line of thinking, then I can solve the bug by simply > using "$Id$" in those two instances and commit it. > > Thoughts? > -- > CRB > -- http://blogs.linux.ie/kenguest/