Re: Re: PEAR CS Documentation Incorrect?
| From: | Chuck Burgess | Date: | Thu, 10 Sep 2009 12:55:59 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: PEAR CS Documentation Incorrect? | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | Groups: | php.pear.dev php.pear.doc |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-52800@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 3:58 AM, Hannes Magnusson <
hannes.magnusson@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 01:30, Chuck Burgess <demon.gene@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Since there's no keyword substitution property already set on the file,
> > plain old "$Id$" should do it then... I've committed that fix now.
>
>
> Doesn't that break your translation versioning?
> phpdoc atleast uses the revision tags to see if a translated file is
> outofdate...
>
> -Hannes
>
It looks to me like the 24 occurrences of *$Id* in the 3500+ files of
peardoc/en are all literal text usages rather than actual $Id$ versioning of
the files themselves. As such, I'm guessing that versioning scheme is not
in play here. In fact, I see some that are clearly supposed to only be the
"$Id$" string used in sentences, but are expanded out (presumably committed
that way back in the CVS days). These instances probably need to be edited
back down to just "$Id$".
A good point to review though... thanks for highlighting it, Hannes.
--
CRB