PEAR CS Documentation Incorrect?

From: Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2009 18:18:15 +0000
Subject: PEAR CS Documentation Incorrect?
Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-52781@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
All, I was reading through the PEAR documentation today, and I noticed something that looked incorrect in two places. On both http://pear.php.net/manual/en/standards.header.php and http://pear.php.net/manual/en/standards.sample.php there is a code sample that contains the following: * @copyright 1997-2005 The PHP Group
 * @license    http://www.php.net/license/3_01.txt  PHP License 3.01
 * @version    SVN: <?php
$ ?> Id:$
 * @link       http://pear.php.net/package/PackageName
 * @see        NetOther, Net_Sample::Net_Sample()
 * @since      File available since Release 1.2.0
I'm thinking this is incorrect, because the class is defined without reopening the <?php tag. Am I missing something, or is this just an error? Since the class is defined after this point, it wouldn't work in PHP. Brandon Savage ================================ Brandon J. Savage brandon@brandonsavage.net Phone: 202.658.7866 Blog: www.brandonsavage.net "Courage is not the absence of fear, but rather the judgment that something else is more important than fear." ~ Ambrose Redmoon

« previous php.pear.dev (#52781) next »