Re: New package category
| From: | Ken Guest | Date: | Sat, 10 Apr 2010 18:35:45 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: New package category | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-53408@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Chuck Burgess <demon.gene@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Matthew Fonda <matthewfonda@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi David,
>>
>> I like the idea of a Feed category. However, my main concern is how to
>> handle existing feed packages? We currently have XML_Feed_Parser and XML_RSS
>> packages in the XML category, and if we introduced a Feed category, users
>> would probably expect to find these packages in Feed, not XML. But migrating
>> these packages to Feed category would pose an issue existing users, so I'm
>> not sure there is a suitable way handle this. I'm +1 if we can come up with
>> a good solution to this issue.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> --Matthew
>>
>
>
> I wonder if one option might be to migrate those XML packages into Feed,
> then have the XML packages remain just as "meta-packages" that list the Feed
> packages as required dependencies...
that would certainly work
> --
> CRB
>
--
http://blogs.linux.ie/kenguest/