Re: Services_Yadis: get rid of PEAR dependency

I'm for it as well as I don't see how it breaks the coding standards and makes the packages PEAR2-ready. On 9 June 2010 13:33, Brett Bieber <brett.bieber@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 7:17 AM, till <till@php.net> wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 10:49 PM, David Coallier <davidc@php.net> wrote: >>> On 4 June 2010 18:04, Bill Shupp <hostmaster@shupp.org> wrote: >>>> Yeah, that's why it's there.  The exceptions extend PEAR_Exception, per >>>> the requirements.  I don't mind removing the parent class of PEAR_Exception, as I'm >>>> pretty sure no one is catching that. >>>> >>> >>> While you are at it, what you could do is try to have native >>> exceptions that follow what kind of exceptions they are expressing and >>> this way it would make the package more PEAR2-ready :) >> >> Is that "allowed" in PEAR1 too? Just curious if a decision was reached.... > > I'm completely for it. > > -- > Brett Bieber > -- David Coallier