Re: Services_Yadis: get rid of PEAR dependency

I'm not an aol-er but, I agree - especially if it makes transitioning packages for PEAR2 easier. k. On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 2:01 PM, David Coallier <davidc@php.net> wrote: > I'm for it as well as I don't see how it breaks the coding standards > and makes the packages PEAR2-ready. > > On 9 June 2010 13:33, Brett Bieber <brett.bieber@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 7:17 AM, till <till@php.net> wrote: > >> On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 10:49 PM, David Coallier <davidc@php.net> wrote: > >>> On 4 June 2010 18:04, Bill Shupp <hostmaster@shupp.org> wrote: > >>>> Yeah, that's why it's there. The exceptions extend PEAR_Exception, > per the requirements. I don't mind removing the parent class of > PEAR_Exception, as I'm pretty sure no one is catching that. > >>>> > >>> > >>> While you are at it, what you could do is try to have native > >>> exceptions that follow what kind of exceptions they are expressing and > >>> this way it would make the package more PEAR2-ready :) > >> > >> Is that "allowed" in PEAR1 too? Just curious if a decision was > reached... > > > > I'm completely for it. > > > > -- > > Brett Bieber > > > > > > -- > David Coallier > > -- > PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > -- http://blogs.linux.ie/kenguest/