Re: Services_Yadis: get rid of PEAR dependency

Can anyone of the PEAR(2) overlords update the RFC accordingly? http://wiki.pear.php.net/index.php/PEAR2_Exception_Policy#Proposed_Changes:Base_Exception_interface ... or maybe that's not the most recent one? Till On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Ken Guest <kguest@php.net> wrote: > I'm not an aol-er but, I agree - especially if it makes transitioning > packages for PEAR2 easier. > > k. > > On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 2:01 PM, David Coallier <davidc@php.net> wrote: >> >> I'm for it as well as I don't see how it breaks the coding standards >> and makes the packages PEAR2-ready. >> >> On 9 June 2010 13:33, Brett Bieber <brett.bieber@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 7:17 AM, till <till@php.net> wrote: >> >> On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 10:49 PM, David Coallier <davidc@php.net> wrote: >> >>> On 4 June 2010 18:04, Bill Shupp <hostmaster@shupp.org> wrote: >> >>>> Yeah, that's why it's there.  The exceptions extend >> >>>> PEAR_Exception, >> >>>> per the requirements.  I don't mind removing the parent class of >> >>>> PEAR_Exception, as I'm pretty sure no one is catching that. >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> While you are at it, what you could do is try to have native >> >>> exceptions that follow what kind of exceptions they are expressing and >> >>> this way it would make the package more PEAR2-ready :) >> >> >> >> Is that "allowed" in PEAR1 too? Just curious if a decision was >> >> reached... >> > >> > I'm completely for it. >> > >> > -- >> > Brett Bieber >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> David Coallier >> >> -- >> PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/) >> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php >> > > > > -- > http://blogs.linux.ie/kenguest/ >