Re: Http_download isnt on github yet (?)

What's the point of creating HTTP_Download2 when there's already HTTP_Request(2) and even PEAR2_HTTP_Request? Aren't they essentially fulfilling the same purpose (with the PEAR2 variant being the namespaced incarnation) of HTTP_Download? 2012/1/9 till <till@php.net>: > On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Kingsquare.nl - Robin Speekenbrink < > robin@kingsquare.nl> wrote: > >> Dear all, >> >> As per the blogpost asking for packages which arent moved to github yet to >> move them: here's one: HTTP_Download. >> >> In order to have PHP5.3 code without deprecation notices (and php5.4+ >> might fail comepletely) i would also at the same time like to see the patch >> on ·î›­ >> 7³Šì‡Ïˆ”ahttp://pear.php.net/bugs/bug.**php?id=17418<http://pear.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=17418>be >> committed: by removing the references from construction, it would work >> without erros :) >> >> If I can help, please let me know! > > > I agree on the move. But since HTTP_Download's minimum PHP version is > 4.2.x, your patch would break BC. > > I think once the code is moved, we should create HTTP_Download2, apply your > patch, update all class names, docs etc.. And release a 0.1.0 of it and > mark the old package superceeded. That would be the clean way to go about > it. With an alpha release and HTTP_Download2 the code could be updated for > PHP 5.3+ or whatever people feel like. > > I've cc'd the active maintainer to see what he thinks. Though I hope no one > would object to leaving PHP4 behind. ;-) > > Till > > >> >> >> -- >> With kind regards, >> >> Robin Speekenbrink >> Kingsquare Information Services >> >> -- >> PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/) >> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php >> >>