Re: Http_download isnt on github yet (?)
| From: | till | Date: | Mon, 09 Jan 2012 17:36:39 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Http_download isnt on github yet (?) | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-54694@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Vasil Rangelov <boen.robot@gmail.com> wrote:
> Actually, I think I just had an idea for a name that would convey the
> purpose a lot more unambiguously: HTTP_Response. Since it's the server
> that gives responses, this clearly conveys the package is a server
> helper. HTTP_Request(2) uses HTTP_Request(2)_Response for its
> responses, so there won't be a conflict.
>
> Thoughts?
>
I'm torn – HTTP_Response_Download? But that may overcomplicate things.
IMHO, the more I think about it, the better HTTP_Download seems. I am sure
somewhere a while back, people had the same train of thought.
Also, as a side-effect – HTTP_Download2 with an identical API (if
possible), makes upgrading for people a lot, lot easier.
Till