Re: Status of SOAP?

Sorry if that's a 'no no' question, but besides being pearified, what's the different between the PEAR SOAP class and the one available from ganx4.com ? On Sun, Apr 14, 2002 at 10:28:14AM -0700, Shane Caraveo wrote : > Björn Schotte wrote: > >* Shane Caraveo wrote: > > > >>It's still pre-1.0, and interfaces are subject to change, but is > >>definitly usable now. > > > > > >Really? I had big troubles when using PEAR::SOAP as a > >server (getting "invalid SOAP request" messages). By > >using Ayala's server classes directly, I've had no > >problems. > > > > It would help to get a report on problems, preferably with example code. > Can't fix what I don't know is broken. When was the last time you tried? > > But I haven't had any problems using the server class, I use it > *constantly* for interop testing. That is however, a limited set of usage. > > It is pre-1.0 for a reason ;) but that doesn't indicate a lack of > usability. So far, I personaly (by some experience) feel this library > is more usable with less bugs than Perl SOAP::Lite and the python soap > libraries. > > Shane > > > > -- > PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php -- Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists. GnuPG Key: http://guru.josefine.at/~mfischer/C2272BD0.asc "Mind if I MFH ?" "What QA did you do on it?" "the usual?" "ah... none :)"