Re: Status of SOAP?

Ok, I see. And how is active development handled? Is the not-pearified version not maintained/developed anymore? Or is it, and all futher changes make it into the PEARified versionk? - Markus On Sun, Apr 14, 2002 at 10:55:33AM -0700, Shane Caraveo wrote : > Markus Fischer wrote: > > Sorry if that's a 'no no' question, but besides being > > pearified, what's the different between the PEAR SOAP class > > and the one available from ganx4.com ? > > There are no 'no no' questions to me. > > I haven't tried to differentiate anything between the two. It's a > matter of personal preference. I wanted a PEAR soap class, and I felt > SOAPx4 was the only good library out there, but it still had numerous > problems at the time. Another reason I did it was that Dietrich started > consulting for NuSphere developing a SOAP library based on SOAPx4. At > the time, it was uncertain what license the resulting work would be > under (it has since been put under LGPL, and interop is excelent). > Rather than writing from scratch I started pearifying SOAPx4 (with > Dietrich's blessings). > > My hope was (and still is) that having a non-GPL version available in a > CVS repository with PEAR would get more people involved in using and > working on it. > > Shane > > > -- > PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php -- Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists. GnuPG Key: http://guru.josefine.at/~mfischer/C2272BD0.asc "Mind if I MFH ?" "What QA did you do on it?" "the usual?" "ah... none :)"