Re: Peardoc2

On Mon, 29 Apr 2002 15:45:14 +0200, Alexander Merz wrote: >Martin Jansen wrote: > >> 1.: The structure of "Packages" should IMO better be: >... >> Otherwise we will have a giantic list of packages on the first >> page, which is very counter-productive. >This is a render problem. book - part - reference. There is no element >between part and reference. A non-render related solution would be to >divide the manual into different books: ><set> > <book>PEAR Introduction > <part>general PEAR doc stuff > <part>PEAR Core > <part>Contributing PEAR > <book>PEAR Packages > <part>Net_Finger > <book>Packages Why don't you use the same structure as in version 1? It worked like a charm there. >> 2.: Just to get it right: "Core" will now only contain documentation >> for PEAR and PEAR_Error, no? > >I suggest the classes of php4/pear/pear too Most of the things there don't really fit in a end-user documentation, don't you think? - Martin