Re: Peardoc2
| From: | (Alexander Merz) | Date: | Mon, 29 Apr 2002 15:17:07 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Peardoc2 | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-5891@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Martin Jansen wrote:
Why don't you use the same structure as in version 1? It worked like a charm there. It is not possible stay on the structure of v1 and to benefit of having a <reference> for every single Package like in v2.Another idea would be to add just links in the Package and the PECL <part>-section and to move the desc at the end of the book <book> <part>... <part>Packages <reference>Net <refsect><link linkend="all.net-finger">Net_Finger <part>... <part id="all">All Packages in alpha order <reference id="all.net-finger">Net_Fínger ...
Most of the things there don't really fit in a end-user documentation, don't you think? If nobody have time to write it...