Re: Peardoc2

On Mon, 2002-04-29 at 16:45, Martin Jansen wrote: > On Mon, 29 Apr 2002 15:45:14 +0200, Alexander Merz wrote: > > >Martin Jansen wrote: > > > >> 1.: The structure of "Packages" should IMO better be: > >... > >> Otherwise we will have a giantic list of packages on the first > >> page, which is very counter-productive. > >This is a render problem. book - part - reference. There is no element > >between part and reference. A non-render related solution would be to > >divide the manual into different books: > ><set> > > <book>PEAR Introduction > > <part>general PEAR doc stuff > > <part>PEAR Core > > <part>Contributing PEAR > > <book>PEAR Packages > > <part>Net_Finger > > <book>Packages > > Why don't you use the same structure as in version 1? It worked > like a charm there. > > >> 2.: Just to get it right: "Core" will now only contain documentation > >> for PEAR and PEAR_Error, no? > > > >I suggest the classes of php4/pear/pear too > > Most of the things there don't really fit in a end-user > documentation, don't you think? If you mean the installer code, I agree, it's not really "re-useful" for most people. - Stig