Re: Re: Possible problem in PEAR Log

Michael Dransfield wrote: > > It was only marked as a possible problem, couldnt it be solved by using a > seperate set of constants (PEAR_LOG_*) which could then be mapped to the > LOG_ constants if needed for syslog features where the integer is needed. That way, we will follow the coding standars too (aren't we boring with that? ;) Tomas V.V.Cox > I think it would be better to be as consistent as possible across > platforms, I can do the changes if they are agreeable. > > At 15:40 03/07/2002 +0200, Pierre-Alain Joye wrote: > >On Wed, 03 Jul 2002 14:36:37 +0100 > >Michael Dransfield <mike@blueroot.net> wrote: > > > > > I am also using win2000, LOG_INFO does equal 6 but so does LOG_DEBUG which > > > overwrites it > > > > > > LOG_NOTICE == LOG_INFO == LOG_DEBUG > > > > > > You can see the bug report here > > > > > > http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=18090 > > > >LOG_EMERG, LOG_ALERT, LOG_CRIT, LOG_ERR => EVENTLOG_ERROR_TYPE > >LOG_WARNING => EVENTLOG_WARNING_TYPE > >LOG_NOTICE, LOG_INFO, LOG_DEBUG => EVENTLOG_INFORMATION_TYPE > > > >As it s reported by Tom in the report. These constants are defined by php > >from the OS system values. The relations give you the equivalent. The > >problem is win32 (NT/2K/ ?XP?) use less log priorities levels than posix > >compliant systems. > > > >We cannot invent levels as far as the system does not manage them. > > > >hth > > > >pa > > > >-- > >PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/) > >To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > -- > PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php