Re: Re: BinaryCloud should be let into PEAR withothers as well.... my 2cents

From: Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2001 11:00:24 +0000
Subject: Re: Re: BinaryCloud should be let into PEAR withothers as well.... my 2cents
References: 1 2 3  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-762@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Alex Black wrote: > > >> Inclusion should not necessarily mean "endorsement" it should mean > >> "base set > >> of quality requirements met" > >> > > > > Ahh.. But I get the feeling it does. > > Right. I think that's a mistake but that's me and this isn't the place for > that. Did that once (the whole proving my point thing) and I only needed to > do that once :) I'm aware of this, and I too probably have a few spots on my record for doing this kind of thing, but I strive not to. It will be less difficult when we have the distribution framework up (I want my hand back dammit), then distributing a PEAR class will no longer be equivalent with "hosted at php.net and pear-dev will rip you to shreds if you misindent one function" :) - Stig

« previous php.pear.dev (#762) next »