Re: Re: BinaryCloud should be let into PEAR withothers as well.... my 2cents
| From: | Stig S. Bakken | Date: | Sun, 15 Jul 2001 11:00:24 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: BinaryCloud should be let into PEAR withothers as well.... my 2cents | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-762@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Alex Black wrote:
>
> >> Inclusion should not necessarily mean "endorsement" it should mean
> >> "base set
> >> of quality requirements met"
> >>
> >
> > Ahh.. But I get the feeling it does.
>
> Right. I think that's a mistake but that's me and this isn't the place for
> that. Did that once (the whole proving my point thing) and I only needed to
> do that once :)
I'm aware of this, and I too probably have a few spots on my record for
doing this kind of thing, but I strive not to. It will be less
difficult when we have the distribution framework up (I want my hand
back dammit), then distributing a PEAR class will no longer be
equivalent with "hosted at php.net and pear-dev will rip you to shreds
if you misindent one function" :)
- Stig