RE: [PEAR-DEV] pear distribution

Well my recent question about dirname(__FILE__) sort of relates to this as this will make dependency checks harder > -----Original Message----- > From: Stig S. Bakken [mailto:ssb@fast.no] > Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 6:45 AM > To: robert janeczek > Cc: pear-dev@lists.php.net > Subject: Re: [PEAR-DEV] pear distribution > > On Mon, 2002-07-08 at 09:44, robert janeczek wrote: > > hi > > > > i`ve talked with some guys from polished linux distribution (pld: > > http://www.pld-linux.org/) and they have some news for > > you: > > - pld is distributing pear packages in rpm files, without 'pear' command > > Cool. The PEAR installer is designed to work nicely with native package > systems, but I haven't tested it yet. I'll take a look and see if they > read my mind right. :-) > > > - they are asking why is pear splited in two parts in cvs (pear and > > php4/pear)? to be honest - they couldn`t find some packages so i > explained > > them where can they look for them. the background of this question is - > when > > will this situation be fixed and all classes will be moved to 'pear' cvs > > module? > > Pretty soon. The three packages that will remain in php4/pear are PEAR, > Console_Getopt and Archive_Tar. These are needed for the installer. In > addition, there are tarballs for other packages in php4/pear/packages > that are also installed during "make install", but I can add a configure > switch to disable installing these. > > > - there is a request to check if end of files is \n not \n\r - it breaks > > something with automatic rpms creation, im not sure what > > Really? Having \r\n is not good, but why should rpm care? Could add > crlf->lf conversion to the package command though. > > - Stig > > -- > Stig Sæther Bakken, Fast Search & Transfer ASA, Trondheim, Norway > http://pear.php.net/wishlist.php/ssb > > > -- > PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php