Re: [need for advices] fastCaching

> > With FileLocking on (default), it's very very difficult to have > > corrupted cache files. But adding a test is possible. A md5 hash > would > > be perfect but we would have to do some benchs. Because adding only > file > > length has to be faster I think. > I've had instances of corrupt cache on Digital Unix using NFS pretty > often (mostly empty files), so this is important, though it could be > optional. > - Brent With file locking on ??? I suppose File Locking is different on Digital Unix. Maybe, a file size in the first line of cache and an optional md5 hash test. I will make some benchs to evaluate the impact of the md5 test. Fabien