Re: Re: Vote: PEAR::Strip_Comments

From: Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 14:09:26 +0000
Subject: Re: Re: Vote: PEAR::Strip_Comments
References: 1 2 3  Groups: php.pear.general 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-general+get-12224@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004, Thorsten Suckow-Homberg wrote: > And btw.: There definitely is a diference in the speed: > > HUGE_FILE.php (5234 lines of comments without code to interpret) > ================================================= > ["mean"]=> string(8) "0.037905" > ["iterations"]=> int(100) > > SMALL_FILE.php (2631 lines of comments without code to interpret) > ================================================= > ["mean"]=> string(8) "0.019446" > ["iterations"]=> int(100) This is somewhat misleading because your script isn't doing anything other than reading in the file. While there may be a 2/3rd improvement in include speed, this is a much smaller percentage improvement when you consider the total time of an "real" script that uses the package. I don't know if it's worth munging files just to save this fractional amount of time. -adam -- adam@trachtenberg.com author of o'reilly's php cookbook avoid the holiday rush, buy your copy today!

« previous php.pear.general (#12224) next »